Compendium of Tribal Crime Data, 2011,  NCJ 234459


This zip archive contains tables in individual  .csv spreadsheets from Compendium of Tribal Crime Data, 2011,  NCJ 234459.  The full report including text and graphics in pdf format are available from: http://www.bjs.gov//index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1599


Tribal Crime Data Collection Activities, 2011  NCJ 234518

tcdca11t01.csv		Table 1. Tribes submitting crime data to the Uniform Crime Reoprting Program (UCR) and receiving Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) awards, FY 2008-2010


Tribal Law Enforcement, 2008 NCJ 234217	
	
tle08f01.csv	Figure 1. Location of tribally operated law enforcement agencies, 2008
tle08f02.csv	Figure 2. Selected law enforcement functions performed by tribal police departments, 2008
tle08f03.csv	Figure 3. Selected court-related functions performed by tribal police departments, 2008
tle08f04csv	Figure 4. Selected special functions performed by tribal police departments, 2008
tle08f05.csv	Figure 5. Task force participation of tribal police departments, 2008	
tle08t01.csv	Table 1. Tribally operated law enforcement agencies, by type of agency and number of full-time sworn personnel, 2008
tle08t02.csv	Table 2. The 25 largest tribally operated law enforcement agencies, by number of full-time sworn personnel, 2008
tle08t03.csv	Table 3. Use of community policing officers and school resouce officers by tribal police departments, 2000 and 2008



State Prosecutors' Offices with Jurisdiction in Indian Country, 2007  NCJ 234241
		
spojic07t01.csv		Table 1. Number of tribes participating in the Census of Tribal Justice Agencies in Indian Country, by P.L. 280 status, type of court systems, and state, 2002
spojic07t02.csv		Table 2. State court prosecutors' offices with jurisdiction for crimes committed in Indian country, by P.L. 280 status and state, 2007
spojic07t03.csv		Table 3. Type of state prosecutors' offices reporting jurisdiction in Indian country, by P.L. 280 status, 2007
spojic07t04.csv		Table 4. Budgets, staffing, and caseload of state prosecutors' offices, by P.L. 280 status, 2007
spojic07f01.csv		Figure 1. State Prosecutors' Offices Reporting Jurisdiction in Indian Country under P.L. 280, 2007
spojic07f02.csv		Figure 2. State prosecutors' offices reporting prosecution of specific crimes in Indian country, by P.L. 280 status, 2007



Selected Findings: Jails in Indian Country, 2009 NCJ 232223			
 	
Tables	
sfjic09t4.1.csv		Table 4.1. Inmates, rated capacity, and percent of capacity occupied in Indian country jails, 2004 and 2007-2009
sfjic09t4.2.csv		Table 4.2. Jails in Indian country that held the majority of inmates in 2009 compared to 2008, by facility
sfjic09t4.3.csv		Table 4.3. Number of Indian country jails, by percent of rated capacity occupied, June 2009
sfjic09t4.4.csv		Table 4.4. Admissions and expected length of stay in Indian country jails during June, by facility size, June 2009
sfjic09t4.5.csv		Table 4.5. Number of inmates confined in Indian country jails, by demographic characteristic, conviction status, and offense, midyear 2002, 2004, and 20072009
sfjic09t4.6.csv		Table 4.6. Persons employed in Indian country jails, by job function, midyear 2009
sfjic09f4.1.csv		Figure 4.1. Inmates confined in Indian country jails, midyear 2000-2004 and 2007-2009
sfjic09f4.2.csv		Figure 4.2. Rated capacity occupied, by type of inmate count, June 2009


Summary: Tribal Youth in the Federal Justice System  NCJ 234218


tyfjst01.csv		Table 1. Reason for matters declined for prosecution with tribal youth suspects, 2005-2008
tyfjst02.csv		Table 2. Federally recognized tribes and enrolled members, 2005
tyfjst03.csv		Table 3. Tribal youth admitted to the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Prisons by offense at commitment, 1999-2008
tyfjsf01.csv		Figure 1. Tribal youth in matters concluded and in matters prosecuted by U.S. attorneys, 2000-2008
tyfjsf02.csv		Figure 2. Case-related reasons for matters declined for prosecution with tribal youth suspects, 2005-2008
tyfjsf03.csv		Figure 3. Tribal youth admitted to the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and five federal judicial districts that committed the majority of tribal youth, 2006-2008
tyfjsf04.csv		Figure 4. Maximum time under federal jurisdiction of juveniles adjudicated delinquent, by age at disposition (illustration only)
tyfjsf05.csv		Figure 5. Tribal youth admitted to the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, by status at admission, 1994-2008
tyfjsf06.csv		Figure 6. Non-tribal youth admitted to the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, by status at admission, 1994-2008
tyfjsf07.csv		Figure 7. Non-tribal youth admitted to the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, and five federal judicial districts that committed the majority of tribal youth, 2006-2008

