U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992: National Pretrial Reporting Program November 1994, NCJ-148818 Full text with tables available from: Bureau of Justice Statistics Clearinghouse 800-732-3277 (fax number for report orders and mail list signup only: 410-792-4358) Box 179 Annapolis Junction, MD. 20701-0179 Highlights * Murder defendants (24%) were the least likely to be released prior to case disposition, followed by defendants whose most serious arrest charge was rape (48%), robbery (50%), or burglary (51%). * A sixth of the defendants detained until case disposition were held without bail. Defendants held without bail comprised 6% of all felony defendants, with defendants charged with murder (40%) the most likely to be denied bail. * Among defendants already on pretrial release for a prior case when arrested on the current felony charges, 56% were released again. Thirty-two percent of those arrested while on parole and 44% of those already on probation were released. * Twenty-seven percent of released defendants had at least one prior felony conviction, including 9% with a prior conviction for a violent felony. Among detained defendants, 57% had a prior conviction, including 21% with at least one prior conviction for a violent felony. * Among released defendants who had failed to appear in court at least once on a previous charge, 38% had a bench warrant issued because they failed to appear during the current case. This was about twice the failure-to-appear rate of other released defendants (20%). *About 14% of all released defendants were rearrested while on pretrial release, 10% for a felony. Released defendants with at least one prior conviction (19%) were about twice as likely to be rearrested as those with no prior convictions (9%). Twenty-nine percent of released defendants with five or more prior convictions were rearrested while on pretrial release. * The overall pretrial release rate of 63% recorded by the 1992 NPRP was similar to that found in 1990 (65%) and 1988 (66%). Failure-to-appear rates have also remained constant at about a fourth of those released. The 1992 rearrest rate of 14% for defendants on pretrial release represented a slight decrease from the 18% rate recorded in 1988 and 1990. Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992: National Pretrial Reporting Program By Brian A. Reaves, Ph.D. and Jacob Perez, Ph.D. BJS Statisticians An estimated 63% of the defendants who had State felony charges filed against them in the Nation's 75 most populous counties during May 1992 were released by the court prior to the disposition of their case. About a third of these released defendants were either rearrested for a new offense, failed to appear in court as scheduled, or committed some other violation that resulted in the revocation of their pretrial release. Of the 25% of released defendants who had a bench warrant issued for their arrest because they did not appear in court as scheduled, about a third, representing 8% of all released defendants, were still fugitives after 1 year. These findings are drawn from a sample of felony cases filed in State courts during May 1992. The cases were followed for up to 1 year as part of the National Pretrial Reporting Program (NPRP) sponsored by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. NATIONAL PRETRIAL REPORTING PROGRAM The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) initiated the biennial National Pretrial Reporting Program (NPRP) in 1988. The NPRP collects detailed information about the criminal history, pretrial processing, adjudication, and sentencing of felony defendants in State courts in large urban counties. The NPRP data do not include Federal defendants. The 1992 NPRP collected data for 13,206 felony cases filed in 40 counties during May 1992. These cases were part of a 2-stage sample that was representative of the estimated 55,246 felony cases filed in the Nation's 75 most populous counties during that month. (In 1990, the 75 largest counties accounted for about 37% of the U.S. population and nearly 50% of all crimes reported to law enforcement agencies.) Cases were tracked for up to 1 year. TYPES OF PRETRIAL RELEASE Nonfinancial release Among the 63% of felony defendants in the 75 largest counties who were released prior to case disposition, about 3 in 5 were released on nonfinancial terms that required no posting of bail. (In this report, "pretrial release" and "released prior to case disposition" are used interchangeably. See Methodology for definitions.) Release on recognizance, granted to 24% of all defendants and to 38% of all released defendants, was the most common type of pretrial release. About two-thirds of all nonfinancial releases involved the release of a defendant on his or her own recognizance. The only condition placed on the defendant under this type of release is a written agreement to appear in court as scheduled. Generally, the recognizance release category used in this report refers to a decision made by the court; however, citation releases made by law enforcement personnel (2% of the recognizance releases) are also included. Approximately 13% of all pretrial releases in the 75 largest counties (23% of nonfinancial releases) were on conditional release. About a fourth of conditional releases included an unsecured bail amount to be forfeited should the defendant fail to appear in court as scheduled. About two-thirds of conditional releases included an agreement by the defendant to maintain regular contact with a pretrial program through telephone calls and/or personal visits. Fifteen percent of conditional releases involved regular drug monitoring or treatment, and 6% included a third party custody agreement. Most defendants placed on conditional release were supervised by a pretrial release program. Such programs, which also interview arrestees and provide information to judicial officers, were operating in all but 2 (Suffolk, Massachusetts; and Montgomery, Pennsylvania) of the 40 NPRP counties during 1992. Releases on unsecured bond comprised 4% of the NPRP cases. About 12% of nonfinancial releases (7% of releases overall) involved this type of release. Although this type of release does not require financial payment, it does specify a bail amount to be forfeited if the defendant does not appear in court as scheduled. Financial release Overall, about 2 in 5 defendants released before case disposition received that release through financial terms involving a surety, full cash, deposit, or property bond. Deposit, full cash, and property bonds are posted directly with the court, while surety bonds involve the services of a bail bond company. Defendants must post the full bail amount in cash or collateral to be released on full cash or property bond. The cash or property is forfeited if the defendants do not appear in court as required. Typically, a defendant must provide 10% of the full bail amount to be released on deposit or surety bond. Either the defendant (deposit bond) or the bail bond company (surety bond) are liable to the court for the full bail amount if the defendant does not appear in court as required. Release on surety bond, the second most common type of pretrial release for felony defendants, was used in 54% of all financial releases and in 21% of all pretrial releases. Surety bond was used in 31 of the 40 NPRP counties surveyed. Ten percent of all pretrial releases, including 25% of financial releases, were on full cash bond. Full cash bond was used in 33 of the 40 NPRP counties surveyed. A deposit bond secured release for about 8% of all released defendants, including 19% of defendants placed on financial release. Deposit bond was used for pretrial release in 17 NPRP counties. Emergency release Overall, about 2% of felony defendants were released as part of an emergency release ordered because of jail crowding. Generally, these emergency releases did not involve the use of any of the financial or nonfinancial release conditions discussed above. Emergency releases occurred in 8 of the 40 NPRP counties, with 3 counties (Hamilton, Ohio; Cook, Illinois; and Wayne, Michigan) accounting for more than 95% of all emergency releases recorded by NPRP. FACTORS AFFECTING PROBABILITY OF PRETRIAL RELEASE Overall, 37% of the felony defendants included in the NPRP sample were detained until the court disposed of their case, roughly the same percentage as in NPRP studies for 1988 (34%) and 1990 (35%). Five out of six detainees from the 1992 study had a bail amount set but did not post the money required to secure release. The remainder, representing 17% of detained defendants and 6% of all defendants, were ordered held without bail. While denial of bail provides the court with an absolute assurance that a defendant will not be released prior to case disposition, the NPRP data also show that when a defendant is required to post bail, the probability of release decreases as bail amounts increase. When bail was set at $20,000 or more, 18% of the defendants were eventually released. When the bail amount was between $10,000 and $19,999, 38% of the defendants secured release; from $2,500 to $9,999, 52% of the defendants; and under $2,500, 66%. The effect of bail amount on the likelihood of a defendant's being released varied according to the type of arrest charge. For example, when the bail amount was set at $20,000 or more, drug defendants (29%) secured release more often than defendants charged with a public-order offense (18%), violent offense (17%), or property offense (11%). Defendants charged with a property offense were less likely to be released than other defendants in all four bail amount categories. Defendants released on deposit bond had higher average bail amounts than other defendants released on bond, a median of $7,500 and a mean of $15,200. Defendants released on surety bond had a median bail amount of $5,000 and a mean bail amount of $7,100. Defendants released on surety or deposit bond typically had to post 10% of the full bail amount to secure release: a mean of $1,520 for deposit bond and $710 for surety bond. Defendants released on full cash bond posted the full bail amount to secure release; a median of $1,000 and a mean of $3,300. Defendants released on unsecured bond did not post any money to secure release but were liable for the full bail amount, a median of $5,000 and a mean of $10,100, if they did not appear in court. Among defendants who had a bail amount set but were unable to secure release, the mean bail amount was $39,800, and the median was $10,000. Type of release bond Median Mean Surety $ 5,000 $ 7,100 Deposit 7,500 15,200 Full cash 1,000 3,300 Property 5,000 10,900 Unsecured 5,000 10,100 Not released $10,000 $39,800 Court decisions about bail are primarily based on the judgment of whether the accused will appear in court as scheduled and the potential danger to the community from crimes that a defendant may commit while on release. Many jurisdictions have established specific criteria that must be considered when setting bail. Examples of such criteria are personal character and mental condition, employment and financial resources, family and community ties, offense seriousness, criminal justice status at the time of arrest, prior criminal record, prior court appearance record, the weight of the evidence against the defendant, and the sentence that may be imposed upon conviction. While the NPRP does not provide data on all of these factors, it does provide information on the seriousness of the current offense, criminal justice status at the time of arrest, prior court appearance record, and prior criminal record. The NPRP data illustrate how the bail system is used in conjunction with these factors to affect the probability of release. Seriousness of offense The NPRP data indicate that defendants charged with murder were the least likely of all felony defendants to be released prior to case disposition (24%). While about a fourth of murder defendants were released, about half of defendants charged with rape, robbery, or burglary were released, as were about two-thirds of assault, theft, or drug trafficking defendants. Murder defendants had the lowest release rate, mainly because they were the most likely to be denied bail or to have a high bail amount. Forty percent of murder defendants were denied bail, compared to 9% or less for other defendants. Among murder defendants who had a bail amount set, about three-fourths had a bail amount of $20,000 or more. Defendants charged with rape (57%) were the next most likely to have bail set at $20,000 or more. Robbery defendants (41%) were the only other group for which more than a third of the defendants with a bail amount had it set by the court at $20,000 or more. Overall, defendants whose most serious arrest charge involved a violent offense (34%) were about twice as likely as drug (16%) and property (16%) defendants to have a bail of $20,000 or more. Among defendants who were held on bail, the median bail amount that had been set by the court was $10,000. The median bail amount was higher for detained defendants charged with murder ($100,000), rape ($25,000), or robbery ($20,000). Released defendants had a median bail amount of $3,500, with a higher median bail amount for released defendants charged with murder ($10,000) or rape ($10,000). Criminal justice status The NPRP data indicate that a defendant's criminal justice status at the time of arrest is also related to the probability of pretrial release. Among felony defendants without an active criminal justice status at the time of arrest, 72% were released before case disposition. In contrast, just 32% of defendants on parole and 44% of defendants on probation at the time of the current arrest were released. Among defendants who were already on pretrial release for a pending case when arrested, 56% were released pending disposition of the current charge. Defendants on parole (14%), probation (11%), or pretrial release (12%), were about 4 times as likely to be denied bail as those with no criminal justice status at the time of the offense (3%). Court appearance history The court is also likely to consider a defendant's court appearance history when setting bail and the terms of release for the current felony charge. About two-thirds of the defendants included in the NPRP study had previously been arrested and required to appear in court. Among defendants who made all scheduled court appearances related to prior arrests, 57% were released prior to disposition of the current case). The probability of release was somewhat lower for defendants who had failed to appear in court previously (51%). Overall, the release rate for defendants who had been previously arrested was 54%, two-thirds the rate among defendants with no prior arrests (81%). Prior conviction record Defendants with more than one prior conviction or with a felony conviction record were less likely than other defendants to await disposition of their case outside jail. Just under half were released prior to case disposition. About 3 in 5 defendants with a single prior conviction or only misdemeanor convictions were able to obtain release, while 4 in 5 defendants with no prior convictions were released. About 10% of defendants who had a prior felony conviction were denied bail, compared to 3% of other defendants. Time from arrest to pretrial release Fifty-two percent of all pretrial releases occurred either on the day of arrest or on the following day, and 91% occurred within 1 month of arrest. The time from arrest to release varied by factors that included the type of release conditions imposed, the bail amount set (if any), and the type of arrest charge. About two-thirds of defendants released on unsecured bond, conditional release, or emergency release were discharged on the day of arrest or on the following day, compared to a third of those who were eventually released on deposit or full cash bond. About half of those released on recognizance, surety bond, or property bond were released within a day of their arrest. Overall, about 2 in 5 financial releases occurred within a day of arrest compared to 3 in 5 nonfinancial releases. When the defendant was required to post money to secure release (surety, full cash, or deposit bond), the time from arrest to pretrial release increased as the bail amount did. When the bail amount was $10,000 or more, 1 in 3 defendants secured release within a day. Nearly 1 in 2 did so when the bail amount was under $2,500. Defendants charged with violent offenses (46%) were slightly less likely than those charged with drug (51%), public-order (53%), or property (56%) offenses to be released on the day of arrest or the following day. CRIMINAL HISTORY OF RELEASED VERSUS DETAINED DEFENDANTS Three-fourths of detained defendants had at least 1 prior conviction compared to just under half of released defendants. Among released defendants, 31% had more than 1 prior conviction, and 5% had 10 or more. Among detained defendants, 59% had more than 1 prior conviction, and 12% had 10 or more. Detained defendants (57%) were about twice as likely to have at least one prior felony conviction as defendants who received pretrial release (27%). About 1 in 5 detained defendants had at least 1 prior conviction for a violent felony compared to 1 in 11 released defend- ants. About 8% of detained defend- ants and 3% of released defendants were under a current charge for a violent felony and had at least one prior conviction for a violent felony. Among released defendants, 47% had not been previously arrested, compared with 20% of detained defendants. Of those released 22% had been previously arrested and failed to appear in court at least once, while 32% had made all scheduled court appearances resulting from prior arrests. About half of detained defendants who had been previously arrested, representing 38% of all detained defendants, had failed to appear in court at least once during a previous case. DEFENDANT CHARACTERISTICS BY TYPE OF PRETRIAL RELEASE Defendants charged with a violent offense comprised the largest percentage among those released on deposit bond (39%), while defendants released under emergency conditions were the least likely to be facing charges for a violent offense (5%). Among the categories of released defendants, those on full cash bond (92%) or deposit bond (90%) had the highest percentage of males. Defendants released on surety bond or emergency release (18%) were less likely to be under age 21 than defendants released under other methods. Without consideration of Hispanic origin, black defendants comprised the largest percentages among defendants released on deposit bond (71%) or emergency release (70%). Black defendants accounted for about half of surety bond and conditional releases, and a significant majority of other types of releases. When Hispanic origin is included in the racial distribution, blacks accounted for a majority of those released on emergency release (70%), deposit bond (64%), and unsecured bond (57%). Among types of financial release, full cash bond (33%) had the largest proportion of Hispanic defendants. Non-Hispanic blacks comprised a larger percentage of defendants released on deposit bond (64%) than either surety bond (44%) or full cash bond (43%). Non-Hispanic whites comprised about a third of the defendants released on surety bond, compared to about a fourth of those released on deposit bond or full cash bond. Among the types of nonfinancial release, unsecured bond (57%) had the highest percentage of non-Hispanic blacks. Hispanic defendants (12%) were less prevalent among this group than among defendants released on recognizance (28%) or conditional release (20%). Non-Hispanic whites accounted for a slightly higher percentage of defendants released on conditional release (31%) or unsecured bond (30%) compared to those released on recognizance (24%). About half of the defendants released on surety, deposit, or full cash bond had a prior conviction for either a misdemeanor or a felony. Slightly lower percentages of defendants given nonfinancial types of release had a conviction record. Among financial releases, the percentage of defendants with one or more prior felony convictions was higher among those released on deposit bond (39%) than among those released on surety bond (25%). Among nonfinancial releases, more defendants released on unsecured bond (35%) had a felony conviction record than other defendants (24%). About 3 in 5 defendants placed on emergency release had a prior conviction and nearly half had more than one prior conviction. Defendants released on emergency release (21%), deposit bond (18%), or unsecured bond (18%) were slightly more likely than other released defendants to have five or more prior convictions. Nearly half of the defendants placed on emergency release (44%) and about a third of the defendants released on unsecured bond (35%) had missed at least 1 court appearance during a previous case. Lower percentages of defendants released on surety bond (16%), conditional release (19%), recognizance (21%), full cash bond (22%), or deposit bond (25%) had previously missed a court appearance. MISCONDUCT BY DEFENDANTS PLACED ON PRETRIAL RELEASE Failure to appear in court A primary goal of any pretrial release decision by the court is to ensure the defendant's appearance in court as scheduled. Among those felony defendants who were released prior to case disposition, 3 out of 4 made all scheduled court appearances. A bench warrant was issued for the arrest of the remaining 25% because they had missed one or more court dates. Two-thirds of these defendants had been returned to the court by the end of the 1-year study period, while a third of them, 8% of all released defendants, remained fugitives. The percentage of defendants who failed to appear varied somewhat by the type of arrest charge. Bench warrants for failure to appear were issued more often for released property defendants (29%) and drug defendants (27%) than for defendants charged with public-order offenses (18%) or violent offenses (17%). Rates of failure to appear varied little by sex or age. By race, failure-to-appear rates ranged from 27% for black defendants to 21% for whites and 15% for defendants of other races. When Hispanic origin was considered, failure-to-appear rates were higher for Hispanics (30%) and non-Hispanic blacks (28%) than for other defendants. A defendant's court appearance history for previous arrests was related to the probability of failing to appear on the current charges. For those who had missed one or more court dates in the past, about 38% failed to make a scheduled court appearance during the current case, nearly twice the failure-to-appear rate of defendants who had made all court appearances related to prior arrests (22%) or had no prior arrests (20%). By type of release, defendants on emergency release (49%) were the most likely to have a bench warrant issued because they failed to appear in court, although in 7 out of 10 such cases they were returned to the court. The next highest failure-to-appear rate was for defendants released on unsecured bond (42%). Bench warrants for failure to appear were less likely to be issued for defendants released on surety bond (15%), conditional release (19%), deposit bond (21%), full cash bond (22%), or personal recognizance (26%). When a defendant missed a court date and a bench warrant was issued, the failure to appear occurred within 1 week of release in 12% of the cases, within 1 month of release in 35% of the cases, and within 3 months in 74% of the cases. For all defendants failing to appear in court, the median time between pretrial release and the initial missed court date was 46 days. Time from release to failure Percent of to appear defendants 1 week 12% 1 month 35 3 months 74 6 months 94 1 year 100 Median 46 days Return of fugitive defendants to the court Overall, about 1 in 13 released felony defendants had failed to appear in court as scheduled and were still fugitives at the end of the year-long study. The percentage of defendants who were fugitives at the end of the study was higher when the method of release was unsecured bond (19%) or emergency release (13%) than when some other type of release was used. About a third of the defendants for whom a bench warrant was issued were returned to the court within 1 month of their failure to appear, and about half had been returned after 3 months. At the end of the 1-year study period, about two-thirds of all defendants who had failed to appear had been returned to the court. (Some defendants returned to the court voluntarily, and the bench warrant for their arrest was withdrawn.) The remaining third were still fugitives. Time from failure Percent of to appear to return defendants 1 week 14% 1 month 34 3 months 51 6 months 59 1 year 68 Median 29 days Not returned within 1 year 32% Among those defendants who failed to appear, the percentage who were still fugitives at the end of the study was highest for those who had been released on unsecured bond (44%). Less than a third of the defendants for whom a bench warrant had been issued remained fugitives when they had been released on surety bond (21%), conditional release (27%), emergency release (27%), or deposit bond (28%). Percent of fugitive Type of pretrial defendants not returned release within 1 year All types 32% Surety bond 21% Conditional 27 Emergency 27 Deposit bond 28 Recognizance 37 Unsecured bond 44 Rearrest for a new offense In addition to considering the likelihood that a released defendant may not return for scheduled court appearances, courts in most States also assess the risk of crimes being committed by a defendant who is not held in jail. Re-arrest data collected during the 1-year study indicated that 14% of released defendants were rearrested for an offense allegedly committed while on pretrial release). By original arrest offense, public-order defendants had a slightly lower rearrest rate (9%) than other defendants. Among those arrested for a new felony following pretrial release (10%), about 3 in 5 were rearrested for the same type of offense as the original charge that preceded their release. Although the misdemeanor rearrest rate (3%) did not vary by sex, the felony rearrest rate for males (11%) was higher than for females (6%). About 15% of black defendants were rearrested, as were 11% of white defendants and 6% of defendants of other races. Hispanic defendants had a rearrest rate of 16%. Defendants under age 21 (16%) had a slightly higher rearrest rate than those age 35 or older (11%). Released defendants with 10 or more prior convictions had a rearrest rate of 38%, 4 times that of defendants who had no prior convictions (9%). About 19% of defendants whose most serious prior conviction was a felony were rearrested for a felony, more than twice the percentage for defendants with no prior felony convictions (7%). For rearrested defendants, the median time from pretrial release to the alleged commission of a new offense was 48 days. About 8% of the new charged offenses occurred within a week of pretrial release, 37% occurred within 1 month, and 71% occurred within 3 months of the defendant's release. Percent of released and rearrested defendants who were charged with committing a new offense within: 1 week 8% 1 month 37 3 months 71 6 months 91 Median 48 days About 63% of the released defendants who were rearrested were again granted pretrial release. Re-release was more likely to occur if the rearrest offense was a misdemeanor (70%) than if it was a felony (61%). Among defendants rearrested for a felony, re-release was slightly less likely if the rearrest was for a drug offense or a violent offense (59%). Percent of rearrested Rearrest defendants who were offense re-released Total 63% Felony 61% Violent 59 Property 63 Drug 59 Public-order 66 Misdemeanor 70% Overall rates of misconduct Overall, 1 in 3 released felony defendants were charged with some type of misconduct committed while on pretrial release. This may have been in the form of a failure to appear in court as scheduled, a new offense allegedly committed while on pretrial release, or some other violation of release conditions that resulted in the revocation of the defendant's pretrial release. In some instances, defendants committed more than one type of pretrial misconduct. The 33% misconduct rate was similar to that found in the two previous NPRP studies based on filings in 1988 (35%) and 1990 (34%). The failure-to-appear rate has remained constant at about a fourth of all released defendants. In 1988 and 1990 about 1 in 6 released defendants were charged with a new offense that they had allegedly committed while on pretrial release. In 1992 about 1 in 7 released defendants were charged with such an offense. About 3 in 8 released drug and property defendants were charged with some type of pretrial misconduct as were 2 in 8 defendants facing violent or public-order charges. Defendants who were male (34%), black (35%), or Hispanic (38%) had somewhat higher pretrial misconduct rates than other defendants. By type of pretrial release, defendants with the highest overall misconduct rates were those placed on emergency release (56%). Aside from those released under emergency conditions, the misconduct rates for other types of pretrial release were lowest for surety bond (23%) and conditional release (26%) and highest for unsecured bond (47%). Overall, defendants released on financial bond (27%) had a slightly lower misconduct rate than those released under nonfinancial conditions (33%). Defendants with multiple prior convictions, or with at least 1 prior felony conviction, had higher than average rates of pretrial misconduct. Defendants with 10 or more prior convictions (54%) were twice as likely to be charged with some type of pretrial misconduct as defendants with no prior convictions (27%). Half of the defendants with at least one prior missed court appearance were charged with some type of pretrial misconduct during the current case, compared to about a third of those who had made all court appearances related to prior arrests, and about a fourth of those who had no prior arrests. ADJUDICATION The median time from the original felony arrest to adjudication of that charge was greater for released defendants (118 days) than for those who had remained in detention (46 days). A month after arrest, detained defendants (39%) were about 3 times as likely as released defendants (14%) to have been adjudicated on their felony arrest charges. By the end of 1 year, 96% of the cases of detained defendants and 86% of the cases of released defendants had been adjudicated. Among detained defendants, those charged with a violent offense (92%) were less likely than others (98%) to have their case adjudicated within a year of their arrest. This finding was especially true for detained murder defendants, about a third of whom were still awaiting adjudication of their case at the end of 1 year. Overall, a higher percentage of detained defendants (79%) than released defendants (61%) were convicted. The lowest conviction rate was for released defendants who were charged with a violent offense (47%). The felony conviction rate among detained defendants was 70%, compared to 45% for released defendants. Among released defendants, 54% of those charged with a drug offense or public-order offense were convicted of a felony, a higher percentage than for those charged with a property offense (44%) or a violent offense (33%). Among defendants detained until case disposition, about two-thirds of those who had been originally charged with a violent offense were convicted of a felony, compared with about three-fourths of those who had been charged with a nonviolent offense. SENTENCING Upon conviction, 87% of detained defendants were sentenced to incarceration, with 50% receiving a prison sentence and 38% a jail term. Fifty-one percent of the released defendants who were convicted were sentenced to incarceration, with more receiving a jail sentence (32%) than a prison sentence (19%). Convicted defendants who were detained until case disposition (50%) were more than twice as likely as released defendants to receive a State prison sentence. More than 90% of both released and detained defendants who were convicted but not sentenced to incarceration received a probation sentence. Among defendants who were detained until case disposition, 67% were convicted and sentenced to incarceration, compared to 29% of those who were released. Detained defendants (39%) were nearly 4 times as likely as released defendants (11%) to be convicted and sentenced to State prison. These differences can be attributed mainly to the fact that some of the factors that affect sentencing decisions, such as seriousness of offense and prior criminal record, also affect pretrial release decisions. METHODOLOGY The NPRP sample was designed and selected by the U.S. Bureau of the Census under BJS supervision. It is a 2-stage stratified sample with 40 of the 75 most populous counties selected at the first stage and a systematic sample of State court felony filings (defendants) within each county selected at the second stage. The 40 counties were divided into 4 first-stage strata based on court filing information obtained through a telephone survey. Fourteen counties were included in the sample with certainty because of their large number of court filings. The remaining counties were allocated to the three noncertainty strata based on the variance of felony court dispositions. The second stage sampling (filings) was designed to represent all defendants who had felony cases filed with the court during the month of May 1992. The participating jurisdictions provided data for every felony case filed on selected days during that month. Depending on the first-stage stratum in which it had been placed, each jurisdiction provided data for 1, 2, or 4 weeks' worth of filings in May 1992. Data from jurisdictions that were not required to provide a full month of filings were weighted to represent the full month. Data on 13,206 sample felony cases were collected from the 40 sampled jurisdictions. This sample represented 55,246 weighted cases filed during the month of May 1992 in the 75 most populous counties. Cases that could not be classified into one of the four major crime categories (violent, property, drug, public-order) because of incomplete information were omitted from the analysis. Cases that were disposed of too quickly to allow time for a pretrial release decision were also excluded. The data collection was supervised by the Pretrial Services Resource Center of Washington, D.C. This report is based on data collected from the following jurisdictions: Arizona (Maricopa); California (Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Clara); District of Columbia; Florida (Broward, Dade, Duval, Hillsborough, Palm Beach, Pinellas); Georgia (Fulton); Illinois (Cook); Maryland (Montgomery); Massachusetts (Essex, Suffolk); Michigan (Wayne); Missouri (St. Louis); New Jersey (Essex); New York (Bronx, Erie, Kings, Monroe, New York, Queens); Ohio (Hamilton); Pennsylvania (Allegheny, Montgomery, Philadelphia); Tennessee (Shelby); Texas (Dallas, Harris, Tarrant); Utah (Salt Lake); Virginia (Fairfax); Washington (King); and Wisconsin (Milwaukee). Because the data came from a sample, a sampling error (standard error) is associated with each reported number. In general, if the difference between two numbers is greater than twice the standard error for that difference, we can say that we are 95% confident of a real difference and that the apparent difference is not simply the result of using a sample rather than the entire population. All differences discussed in this report were statistically significant at or above the 95-percent confidence level. Race/Hispanic origin Several jurisdictions did not provide complete reporting for defendants' Hispanic origin. As a result, the overall reporting level for race combined with Hispanic origin was 77% compared to 91% for race alone. Because of this underreporting, the categories of race alone account for more defendants in tables 13 through 16 than the categories that include both race and Hispanic origin. A large preponderance of the persons with a Hispanic origin were white, although the category includes all races. Offense categories Felony offenses were classified into 13 categories for this report. These categories were further divided into the four major crime categories of violent, property, drug, and public-order offenses. The following listings contain a representative summary of most of the crimes contained in each category; however, these lists are not meant to be exhaustive. All offenses, except for murder, include attempts and conspiracies to commit. Violent offenses Murder--Includes homicide, nonnegligent manslaughter, and voluntary homicide. Does not include attempted murder, classified as felony assault or negligent homicide, and involuntary homicide and vehicular manslaughter, which are classified as other violent offenses. Rape--Includes forcible intercourse, sodomy, or penetration with a foreign object. Does not include statutory rape or nonforcible acts with a minor or someone unable to give legal consent, nonviolent sexual offenses, and commercialized sex offenses. Robbery--Includes the unlawful taking of anything of value by force or threat of force. Assault--Includes aggravated assault, aggravated battery, attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, felony assault battery on a law enforcement officer, or other felony assaults. Does not include extortion, coercion, or intimidation. Other violent offenses--Includes vehicular manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, negligent or reckless homicide, nonviolent or nonforcible sexual assault, kidnaping, unlawful imprisonment, child or spouse abuse, cruelty to child, reckless endangerment, hit and run with bodily injury, intimidation and extortion. Property offenses Burglary--Includes any type of entry into a residence, industry, or business with or without the use of force with the intent to commit a felony or theft, such as forcible entry and breaking and entering. Does not include possession of burglary tools, trespassing, and unlawful entry where the intent is not known. Theft--Includes grand theft, grand larceny, motor vehicle theft, or any other felony theft. Does not include receiving or buying stolen property, fraud, forgery, or deceit. Other property offenses--Includes receiving or buying stolen property, forgery, fraud, embezzlement, arson, reckless burning, damage to property, criminal mischief, vandalism, bad checks, counterfeiting, criminal trespassing, possession of burglary tools, and unlawful entry. Drug offenses Drug sales/trafficking--Includes trafficking, sales, distribution, possession with intent to distribute or sell, manufacturing, or smuggling of controlled substances. Does not include possession of controlled substances. Other drug offenses--Includes possession of controlled substances, prescription violations, possession of drug paraphernalia, and other drug law violations. Public-order offenses Driving-related--Includes driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol, driving with a suspended or revoked license, or any other felony in the motor vehicle code. Weapons--Includes the unlawful sale, distribution, manufacture, alteration, transportation, possession, or use of a deadly weapon or accessory. Other public-order offenses--Includes flight/escape, parole or probation violations, prison contraband, habitual offender, obstruction of justice, rioting, libel and slander, weapons offenses, treason, perjury, prostitution/ pandering, bribery, and tax law violations. Terms related to pretrial release Released defendant--Includes any defendant who was released from custody prior to the disposition of his or her case by the court. Includes defendants who were detained for some period of time before being released and defendants who were returned to custody after being released because of a violation of the conditions of pretrial release. Detained defendant--Includes any defendant who remained in custody from the time of arrest until the disposition of his or her case by the court. This report also refers to detained defendants as "not released." Failure to appear--Occurs when a court issues a bench warrant for a defendant's arrest because he or she has missed a scheduled court appearance. Types of financial release Full cash bond--The defendant posts the full bail amount in cash with the court. If the defendant makes all court appearances, the cash is returned. If the defendant fails to appear in court, the bond is forfeited. Deposit bond--The defendant deposits a percentage (usually 10%) Of the full bail amount with the court. If the defendant fails to appear in court, he or she is liable to the court for the full amount of the bail. The percentage bail is returned after the disposition of the case, but the court often retains a small portion for administrative costs. Surety bond--A bail bond company signs a promissory note to the court for the full bail amount and charges the defendant a fee for the service (usually 10% of the full bail amount). If the defendant fails to appear, the bond company is liable to the court for the full bail amount. Frequently the bond company requires the defendant to post collateral in addition to the fee. Property bond--Also known as collateral bond, this involves an agreement made by a defendant as a condition of pretrial release requiring that property valued at the full bail amount be posted as an assurance of his or her appearance in court. If the defendant fails to appear in court, the property is forfeited. Types of nonfinancial release Unsecured bond--The defendant pays no money to the court but is liable for the full amount of bail should he or she fail to appear in court. Release on recognizance--The court releases the defendant on the promise that he or she will appear in court as required. Citation release--Arrestees are released pending their first court appearance on a written order issued by law enforcement personnel. Citation release is included in the recognizance release category in this report. Conditional release--Defendants are released under conditions and are usually supervised by a pretrial services agency. In some cases an unsecured bond is included. This type of release is also known as supervised release. Other type of release Emergency release--Defendants are released solely in response to a court order placing limits on a jail's population. * * * * * Brian A. Reaves and Jacob Perez wrote this report. Pheny Z. Smith provided statistical review. Tom Hester edited the report, assisted by Rhonda Keith, who did the page layout. Marilyn Marbrook produced the final report, assisted by Jayne Robinson and Yvonne Boston. November 1994, NCJ-148818 END OF FILE